Sunday, December 18, 2011
Fast & Furious - A Quick Overview
F&F is a scandal that started at the beginning of the Obama administration. Hundreds of lives have been lost and our officials in charge are either being promoted or remaining in office. We cannot be a leader in the world economy without transparency and honesty in our policies. "Transparency" was something this current administration PROMISED, but as politicians typically promise and never deliver, this President follows suit with every other politician. Hope ya'll are planning a great Christmas! God Bless and Merry Christmas!!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/15/obamas-watergate-758295296/
Ted
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/15/obamas-watergate-758295296/
Ted
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
New Russian stuff!
Just thought I would throw out a quick article with links to some very cool looking new russian firearms looking to be released very soon from the Izhmash factory. In case you have not experienced any of their quality firearms, you should take the time and check'em out. They are good quality for the money.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/here-are-two-new-russian-guns-that-our-troops-could-face-on-the-battlefield/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/here-are-two-new-russian-guns-that-our-troops-could-face-on-the-battlefield/
Monday, November 14, 2011
America - Come together as one.
Our country is at an impasse that will go down in history. As the end of 2011 draws to a close and the election activity is ramping up, numerous scandals are knocking on the Whitehouse front door. We have seen the death of Osama Bin Laden from the result of the 'outlawed' tactic of waterboarding. Our President thinks the taxpayer money is an endless supply, mainly to be utilized for his upcoming campaign. The Attorney General Eric Holder is apologizing through Politico.com to a Border Patrol agent's family for Agent Terry's death which was the direct result of illegal actions by BATFE under his supervision in the 'Fast and Furious' operation. Occupy Wall Street has become a filthy, disease infested parade of drug users and transients with the focus of a floodlight. If that isn't enough to comprehend, we now find out that Israel is seriously considering an attack on Iran due to their increasing ability to produce nuclear weapons. Once you have wrapped your head around all of those issues, our president is calling us 'lazy' because WE haven't done enough to fix the economy.
Currently, scandals are becoming an everyday occurrence and most of the American people are either going the way of the ostrich with their head in the sand or voicing their opinion and being labeled as crazy or biased. Will America wake up? Can we overcome the damage that has been done by the irresponsible actions of our leadership? Our country has been able to establish and maintain a reputation for overcoming adversity with the current happenings being the "final test" of our persistence and determination that is the very blood in our veins as Americans. We must come together as a nation in order to be the leading example of how democracy can succeed in a complex world. The belief that Democracy is to blame for the current situation is similar to the argument that "matches cause arson". In all of the world's constantly changing political landscape, one theme is constant, CORRUPTION. Whether it was Socialism, Democracy, Oligarchy, or a Monarchy, the one issue that consistently devours our ability to succeed is the ability to corrupt our leaders. It starts with a self-serving attitude in local government. The city counsel members passing ordinances that will benefit those businesses that support the elected leaders and then moves up the ladder to kickbacks from the whitehouse administration to political contributors through government contracts to companies like Halliburton and Solyndra.
We as Americans need to do our own research and come together on an independent idea, away from the partisan politics. Our constitution is an amazing document that has been fouled by misguided and corrupt politicians since the day Lincoln was shot. If we can go back to what our founding fathers originally designed, then we can come out and show our world why we are the leaders of the Free World.
Currently, scandals are becoming an everyday occurrence and most of the American people are either going the way of the ostrich with their head in the sand or voicing their opinion and being labeled as crazy or biased. Will America wake up? Can we overcome the damage that has been done by the irresponsible actions of our leadership? Our country has been able to establish and maintain a reputation for overcoming adversity with the current happenings being the "final test" of our persistence and determination that is the very blood in our veins as Americans. We must come together as a nation in order to be the leading example of how democracy can succeed in a complex world. The belief that Democracy is to blame for the current situation is similar to the argument that "matches cause arson". In all of the world's constantly changing political landscape, one theme is constant, CORRUPTION. Whether it was Socialism, Democracy, Oligarchy, or a Monarchy, the one issue that consistently devours our ability to succeed is the ability to corrupt our leaders. It starts with a self-serving attitude in local government. The city counsel members passing ordinances that will benefit those businesses that support the elected leaders and then moves up the ladder to kickbacks from the whitehouse administration to political contributors through government contracts to companies like Halliburton and Solyndra.
We as Americans need to do our own research and come together on an independent idea, away from the partisan politics. Our constitution is an amazing document that has been fouled by misguided and corrupt politicians since the day Lincoln was shot. If we can go back to what our founding fathers originally designed, then we can come out and show our world why we are the leaders of the Free World.
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Senator Prozanski's Letter
Below is a copy of what our beloved Sen. Prozanski sent out to all of the folks who contacted him about the ongoing legislation in Oregon. Take a read and let me know what you think about his "Pro-Gun" attitude. Feel free to let him know what you think about his views and recent actions in the Oregon Senate.
I want to thank everyone who sent me their comments on the various gun bills that were assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I especially want to thank the vast majority of individuals who discussed the merits of those bills with civility and respect.
Unfortunately, many of you have received inaccurate "alerts" and other correspondence, including allegations that I am against keeping Concealed Handgun License (CHL) holders’ and applicants' personal information confidential. That is not true. In fact, I support keeping such information confidential. You also have been told that I am "anti-gun." That is also inaccurate.
Let me first set the record straight about myself. I was born and grew up in Texas. I lived there for almost 30 years. I purchased my first gun when I was 15 years old and have continuously owned firearms ever since. My sister was murdered with a handgun in 1973. I believe the state has the right and duty to place reasonable restrictions on whom can possess guns and where they can be carried. I have been a prosecutor in Oregon for 24 years. As a gun owner for more than 40 years, I support both the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 27 of the Oregon Constitution.
Now let me set the record straight about the firearms legislation pending in this year's Legislative Session. To maximize (really? this is the poison pill) support, I amended a bill in the committee to incorporate several changes into one firearms bill. As amended, HB 2797 includes these major points. It:
- Prohibits the disclosure of personal information of CHL holders and applicants, Clarifies when and how ATV operators and motorcyclists can carry firearms,
- Prohibits certain felons from petitioning the court for restoring gun rights,
- Prohibits guns on public school campuses,
- Requires a report from the State Police on compliance with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System Improvement Amendments Act of 2007,
- Includes provisions limiting police authority to arrest or charge a CHL holder,
- Limits prosecution of CHL holders to state (not federal) law violations, and
- Repeals the law requiring an individual to allow police to examine a firearm to see if it is loaded or not.
Many of you have received information from Kevin Starrett of Oregon Firearms Federation, who has used scare tactics, misinformation and "photo shopped" pictures to berate the bill or me. He seems more interested in drumming up contributions than discussing the merits of the entire bill. In fact, it seems he only disagrees with only two points of the bill.
Kevin has previously testified that he believes all felons including murderers and rapists should be eligible to petition a court to restore their gun rights. I disagree. I have spoken to numerous OFF and NRA members who agree with me that certain felons should be prohibited from restoring their gun rights.
Kevin also believes that a CHL holder should be able to carry a firearm into any public building including schools. Again, I disagree with him. I believe certain public buildings including courthouses and schools should be off limits for guns, except for ROTC programs and gun safety classes.
Some of you may have also received an e-newsletter from Senator Jeff Kruse making inaccurate claims about the bill, the committee process, and my intentions and position on these gun bills. It is unfortunate, because misinformation does a service to no one. Even though Jeff claims that I am "anti-gun" (I am not) he in fact voted with me and the three other committee members to amend another firearms bill, HB 2792, to pass it to the Senate floor with a "do pass" recommendation.
I've heard from constituents who have two significant issues with HB 2797. Some support making CHL holders and applicants' personal information confidential, and some support prohibiting CHL holders from carrying weapons on public school grounds. Many individuals support only one of these provisions, but not both. I support both, along with the other provisions of the amended bill.
I hope this letter clarifies what is actually included in HB 2797 as well as my personal beliefs and history regarding gun rights. I understand that we may not always agree, but I am open to hearing your point of view. Again, I want to thank everyone who contacted me and was civil in expressing their views.
What Prozanski has done is attach an anti-gun legislation amendment to a pro second amendment bill. The part where he wants to ban firearms from public schools and courthouses. Oregon law already regulates the carrying of firearms on federal and state facilities. There is no need for this amendment. Creating a gun free zone at a school will only create a shooting gallery for the insanely crazy folks who choose to assault our schools. Additionally, the banning of certain felons to ask for their gun rights back is just ridiculously insane. There are instances where some people may have an opportunity to change their life and redeem their rights to vote and own firearms, this is commendable and the opportunity for them to have their rights back is up to the courts, not some guy in the legislature who doesn't agree with current policy. There should not be a limit on this, because if a murdering rapist is applying for his gun rights, shouldn't we first ask ourselves, "what the hell is this person doing back on the streets?"
I want to thank everyone who sent me their comments on the various gun bills that were assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I especially want to thank the vast majority of individuals who discussed the merits of those bills with civility and respect.
Unfortunately, many of you have received inaccurate "alerts" and other correspondence, including allegations that I am against keeping Concealed Handgun License (CHL) holders’ and applicants' personal information confidential. That is not true. In fact, I support keeping such information confidential. You also have been told that I am "anti-gun." That is also inaccurate.
Let me first set the record straight about myself. I was born and grew up in Texas. I lived there for almost 30 years. I purchased my first gun when I was 15 years old and have continuously owned firearms ever since. My sister was murdered with a handgun in 1973. I believe the state has the right and duty to place reasonable restrictions on whom can possess guns and where they can be carried. I have been a prosecutor in Oregon for 24 years. As a gun owner for more than 40 years, I support both the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 27 of the Oregon Constitution.
Now let me set the record straight about the firearms legislation pending in this year's Legislative Session. To maximize (really? this is the poison pill) support, I amended a bill in the committee to incorporate several changes into one firearms bill. As amended, HB 2797 includes these major points. It:
- Prohibits the disclosure of personal information of CHL holders and applicants, Clarifies when and how ATV operators and motorcyclists can carry firearms,
- Prohibits certain felons from petitioning the court for restoring gun rights,
- Prohibits guns on public school campuses,
- Requires a report from the State Police on compliance with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System Improvement Amendments Act of 2007,
- Includes provisions limiting police authority to arrest or charge a CHL holder,
- Limits prosecution of CHL holders to state (not federal) law violations, and
- Repeals the law requiring an individual to allow police to examine a firearm to see if it is loaded or not.
Many of you have received information from Kevin Starrett of Oregon Firearms Federation, who has used scare tactics, misinformation and "photo shopped" pictures to berate the bill or me. He seems more interested in drumming up contributions than discussing the merits of the entire bill. In fact, it seems he only disagrees with only two points of the bill.
Kevin has previously testified that he believes all felons including murderers and rapists should be eligible to petition a court to restore their gun rights. I disagree. I have spoken to numerous OFF and NRA members who agree with me that certain felons should be prohibited from restoring their gun rights.
Kevin also believes that a CHL holder should be able to carry a firearm into any public building including schools. Again, I disagree with him. I believe certain public buildings including courthouses and schools should be off limits for guns, except for ROTC programs and gun safety classes.
Some of you may have also received an e-newsletter from Senator Jeff Kruse making inaccurate claims about the bill, the committee process, and my intentions and position on these gun bills. It is unfortunate, because misinformation does a service to no one. Even though Jeff claims that I am "anti-gun" (I am not) he in fact voted with me and the three other committee members to amend another firearms bill, HB 2792, to pass it to the Senate floor with a "do pass" recommendation.
I've heard from constituents who have two significant issues with HB 2797. Some support making CHL holders and applicants' personal information confidential, and some support prohibiting CHL holders from carrying weapons on public school grounds. Many individuals support only one of these provisions, but not both. I support both, along with the other provisions of the amended bill.
I hope this letter clarifies what is actually included in HB 2797 as well as my personal beliefs and history regarding gun rights. I understand that we may not always agree, but I am open to hearing your point of view. Again, I want to thank everyone who contacted me and was civil in expressing their views.
What Prozanski has done is attach an anti-gun legislation amendment to a pro second amendment bill. The part where he wants to ban firearms from public schools and courthouses. Oregon law already regulates the carrying of firearms on federal and state facilities. There is no need for this amendment. Creating a gun free zone at a school will only create a shooting gallery for the insanely crazy folks who choose to assault our schools. Additionally, the banning of certain felons to ask for their gun rights back is just ridiculously insane. There are instances where some people may have an opportunity to change their life and redeem their rights to vote and own firearms, this is commendable and the opportunity for them to have their rights back is up to the courts, not some guy in the legislature who doesn't agree with current policy. There should not be a limit on this, because if a murdering rapist is applying for his gun rights, shouldn't we first ask ourselves, "what the hell is this person doing back on the streets?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)